
I have at least two people on my friend's list doing reviews now, so hey why not?
I decided to write this up because I have heard such wide responses about this movie from my friends. I've had some who really liked it, and I had some who literally walked out of the theater they thought it was so bad.
So here we go! Review number one! Its a movie trying to be two things at once. Its a psychological and moral journey that really wants to be an action movie, and suffers for it.
Will smith isn't who I would have cast as the main character. Need someone more gaunt, more obsessive, more mad scientist. Less charismatic. Even with Smith, should have played up his obsessiveness with repetition and order and his extremely rigid viewpoint, and why he was so upset meeting other humans, because it put him into an unknown place, and took him out of his rigid obsessive comfort. Also, it says he was supposed to be 52 when he died? Will Smith is not and does not look 52.
Its not that Will Smith does bad, he actually does pretty decently at what he is asked to do. It's just not his area of expertise. He's type cast as an action hero, and I know he's trying to break out of that a bit, but with the film already pretending to be an action film, he doesn't do it any favors. There's plenty of actors that would be more appropriate for an obsessed doctor in their 50's that can't let go of their rigid mindset and morally questionable actions.
Would have been better to use real people instead of CGI and less action. People looking for a horror or action movie are going to be disappointed at the feeble attempt anyways. Don't attempt to pander to them and fail at it. Just be one thing, and be that well.
As a psychological journey and metaphor for perseverance in trying to save people who don't want to be saved, it comes off decently, but you have to look for it somewhat, it doesn't attempt to pull it off as well as it should because of the pandering to the action crowd.
The attempt to fuse the story with Bob Marley's struggle was not a bad idea, but it comes across a little contrived with the movie trying to be an action movie. I do like the idea though and wish it had come off better. The problem is though, if that was their point, he sure was ruthless towards them. They should have found a more altruistic ending than killing their leader with a grenade.
---
I have to say though, after watching the movie, then reading about the book, the book sounds awesome. The book takes an entirely different approach, with Neville realising the infect actually are rebuilding their own society and they view him as a predator they must destroy to save themselves. The infected are also against the vampires, which are the dead that have been revived and are completely mindless. Also, in the book, Ruth is actually one of the infected, sent to try to reason with him. In the end, they execute him, very 'humanely' (infectedly?) by pills, and he realizes that in the past, vampires were legend, but now he is the genetic deviant of society, and he is the legend, and the monster.
The book was also used as the basis for the movies The Last Man on Earth (1964, starring Vincent Price) and The Omega Man (1971, Starring Charlton Heston)
Reading up on them, it doesn't sound like either of those did the book justice though, one capitalizing on the pure man vs monster concept with little attention to any sort of moral questioning, and the second an action VS film as well. In that sense maybe the 2007 movie does attempt a better approach.
Someone still needs to make a movie about the original book.
----
p.p.s. It turns out the alternate ending to the film is much more along the lines of the book. Instead of killing the leader, he realizes that the leader wants the girl back, and complies. The infected leave with the girl, leaving him alive and he looks at all the photos of the infected he killed and realizes to them, he is the monster.
Apparently the film directors felt that this was too deep for mainstream audiences and they would only understand killing the big mean leader instead of moral ambiguity. Sad.
I give the movie with the original ending 7/10, I give the one shown in theaters 5/10.